pros and cons of electing judges pros and cons of electing judges

Please describe what happened and, Describe the characteristics of the state bureaucracy.Have you ever had a frustrating experience with a state agency, such as the Department of Public Safety?Please describe what happened, and how/if, Describe the sessions and salaries in the state legislature. Our Chief Justice of our great state Texas has had an economic and societal impact involving the growth of legal aid funding involving poverty. Obedience of the law is demanded; not asked as a favor,(1) was said by Theodore Rosevelt in regards to how important the law is to a country. When citizens have the chance to elect their own judges, it is believed to help rebuild faith in the judicial system and in the government as a whole. The jury system provides a definitive conclusion to the innocence of those who have been accused of a crime. Are the judges in your home state appointed or elected? Each has its advantages and disadvantages. Thanks, I honestly support the idea of voting for judges. Crime can be found throughout that world and is an unfortunate part of society, which must be dealt with in order to prevent the demise of law and order in a society. But, I believe this can still be done by setting an specific time for the judge to leave the position and therefore, I believe it is unnecessary for judges to hold their position for lifetime., ountries that have never had a jury system, or have had one in the past, have turned to citizens to decide criminal cases. Perhaps that biggest problem with electing judges is that not all elections are the same. Secondly, younger Americans are more cynical and disconnected from politics than ever. I agree with your point of view on the pros and cons on electing judges. Texas has trial courts and appellate. Others argue elections provide a way for the people to hold judges accountable and that the key to keeping courts fair and impartial is by educating the public. In opposition to most states, Texas is one of a handful to do partisan elections to vote for judges. According to Professor DeBow of the Stanford School of Law, This democracy business can be a little messy at times. Why Having a Business Succession Plan is Important, 5 Legal Concerns for Owners of Waterfront Property, Enjuris: Directory for Personal Injury Lawyers, Firefighters Could Receive Workers Comp for PFAS in Turnout Gear, Illinois Man Loses Both Legs but Wins $91 Million from 7-Eleven, Hazmat Train: Derailment Causes Health Risks in Ohio Town, Enjuris Interview: Meet South Carolina Workers Compensation and Personal Injury Lawyer George Taylor, New Colorado Law Extends Workers Comp Reporting Time, Stephanie Tucker Receives WILGs 2021 Rising Star Award, Mack Babcock Swears In As President of WILG, A National Non-Profit for Injured Workers, Wall Street Journal Interviews Mack Babcock About COVID-19 Workers Comp Claims Denials, Dogs Object to Bill Making It Illegal to Stick Their Heads Out of Car Windows, Bill Would Establish Official State Aroma. When drafted, the conditions used to help shape the writing of the constitution were very different, especially for the old Confederacy. With the partisan election is makes the voting process go along much faster seeing as they can just head to one of 3 columns, either Democrat, Republican or Independent, and they don't have to sift through a huge list of people choosing which would be best to vote for. What. I'm Marysa, a busy mom of two girls, and our family lives in Upstate NY. How the new president forms the court will differ depending on which party controls the Senate after the, The Texas Judicial system is a puzzling topic to most citizens and has its pros and cons. Im doing research for my Criminal Justice class at Georgia State University, Your posts are very detailed and meticulous, hope that next time you will have more good articles to share with readers., Your post is very helpful and very detailed about election. 2. Additionally, many also feel there isnt enough separation between the branches of government and that checks and balances do not work correctly. Here are some of the pros and cons of electing judges. While electing judges is not a flawless system, it is better than alternatives. \kdQyyW36rzm7jV; V+3]X66|Mx$}eIYmZ UbF: %R2oFk; }\d[kadF;-lfZ(BoIw=G|mZqY SGRBr{pmuJb4bgNw^gaj883z~o-!${XtK60uSX1ht_i-Zk(~$Cq:"&~P4\&"BXX?W/F=00p t;kiR]nIp[&tk Many people feel that judges and other government officials are in the pockets of large corporations. Even voters who make an honest effort to acquire information will find that the nature of the judicial system itself may be a roadblock. Some argue the system should change because of possible bias both by the electorate and of the judge, others contend it is necessary to know what party the judges affiliate with in order to know what way they lean may lean in their final judgement. One problem with elections is that many judges never need to run against an opponent. "Hot coffee" shows other side of "frivolous" lawsuits, New HBO film "hot coffee" shows texas' role in campaign to limit lawsuits against business, (2011). What Can I Expect at a Mediation Session? Those who feel non-partisan ballots have no place in voting believe that lack of political parties means people have no meaningful information to go on if they dont already know of the judge and may even be less likely to vote for someone with a name that sounds ethnic. Get Cornell news delivered right to your inbox. So the theory goes. Want to get paid to blog about DeSantis? Lol I must admit I am one of those who feel that judges and other government officials are in the pockets of large corporations. Dallas: Newstex. But given that convicted murderers are not exactly a popular group with the public, the disparity in how judges in different electoral situations reacted is concerning to anyone who simply wants the rule of law to hold sway in all cases. The current Chief Justice of Texas, Nathan Hecht is a Republican from Dallas, Texas. This confuses the voter like I mentioned before and makes them not want to go out and vote. The 2020 election year is well underway, which means youve probably been considering where to cast your vote. The federal judiciary is straightforward and methodical, with three levels of courts which include, district courts, appeals courts, and the U.S. Supreme Court, the last word on all statutory and protected matters. This is to ensure that people of a society are living in a place where they are free of fear, and able to reside in peace. Lim points out that governors have an advantage when appointing judges because they are likely to have more accurate information about the political preferences and sentencing approaches of a candidate than is generally available to voters during a campaign. Also, another headline happening not too long ago, involving Chief Justice Nathan Hecht about the fine settling charges that he broke state campaign finance laws represents another impact he had on our state. Levingson claims life tenure for Supreme Court justices "is an idea whose time has passed, and it offers a good reason for any concerned citizen to be dissatisfied with the constitution" (Levingson, p.126)., Before the election, if President Obama was not able to get the Senate to approve his United States Supreme Court applicant, the next president would potentially be responsible for filling the vacant spots on the court over the term due to possible retirements and deaths. In traditional economic thought, competition is always good, and just as it's good for the economy, competitive elections should also make things better. a small committee nominates candidates for judges based on qualification and merit; the governor chooses from the list; after a year, voters are asked to either keep or remove him . Retrieved from, com.ezproxy1.apus.edu/docview/873788499?accountid=8289. In the next couple paragraphs I will talk more specifically about these topics. Additionally, judges are rarely removed when they stand for retention, and frequently don't have opposition in elections, so merit selection often results in what amounts to life tenure for judges. On the down side, critics indicate that judges should spend their time reducing the backlog of cases rather than campaigning for office, that elections force candidates to solicit campaign contributions from lawyers and possible litigants, and candidates may wind up deep in debt or may lack sufficient money to properly inform the voters of their merits. As a result, the Texas constitution is often ridiculed because of its lengthiness and anonymity that results in frequent constitutional amendments. If they have to run for elections, they are subject to the public for their retention. Many people are unaware of how little they understand about the world and the law that applies to the society in order to prevent conflict. In your opinion,does our state legislature work for the needs of the citizens of Texans? The University of Denver is an equal opportunity affirmative action institution. Every single elected judge is appointed, not elected, and Supreme Court judges are selected forever, with the plan of expelling the judiciary from the pressure of electoral politics permitting insurance of minority interests in government system intended to rule. Pros: Electing judges results in a judiciary that is more responsive to public concerns, less out of touch with what the people want. Having the jury system is effective and useful because Canada prides itself in its value of democracy which is shown through the involvement in justice, it allows for the peers of an accused to hear the entire facts of a case and the fate of the accused is not in the hands of solely one individual who may have conflicting opinions and values than that of the accused. Florida gun owners should be held responsible for securing their weapons | Letters, How about spending more on preventing crime? It is inconsistent with Article Three of the Constitution -that applies to federal appointments to the Bench. In the case of state court judges, for example, elected judges are far more variable in their sentencing than appointed judges, according to a new study. What are the Biggest Problems with the American Jury System? Amendment A's critics have been implying South Dakota's citizen jurors and judges aren't bright enough to tell a good explanation from a bad one, and . The theme this year is "Celebrate Your Freedom: Independent Courts Protect Our Liberties.". It ensures that they maintain high ethical standards and follow the constitution to the end for fear of being voted out if they do the contrary. Levingston reasons that in spite of judges' terms of service, they "cannot be removed from office for partisan political reasons [;] so long as the judges behavior is within the range viewed as good, that is uncorrupted then they are protected against losing their positions" (Levingson, p.126). Critics suggest that though States may be unable to fully eliminate politics from the judicial section process, appointment methods see less bias and are better able to mitigate political influences.