The Psychology Today interview with Jean Piaget took place in 1970 at the height of his influence. By way of a response, consider the following: Where Ss action E in world W1 (a world without alternate possibilities, owing to the possibility of intervention) and Ss action E in twin world W2 (which differs from W1 only insofar as it is a world with alternate possibilities) are congruent then S in either world is morally responsible for E. To illustrate how one might apply the twin world condition, consider scenarios (1) and (2): W1 (No alternate possibilities): S does E (an immoral act), W2 (alternate possibilities are available): S does E (an immoral act), W1 (No alternate possibilities): S does E (a moral act), W2 (alternate possibilities are available): S does E (a moral act). Philosophia 44, 961969 (2016). The team usually (donates, donate) their old uniforms to a group of disadvantaged youth. Furthermore one may suggest that other nations are now, or will soon be, not entirely unaware of our present achievements, and that consequently the postponement of a demonstration may serve no useful purpose as far as the avoidance of an armaments race is concerned, and may only create additional mistrust, thus worsening rather than improving the chances of an ultimate accord on the international control of nuclear explosives. No two are alike, not even a tiny bit. His dreams of a certain amount of land for each person have been realized to a point in American suburbs, but many of these bedroom communities lack the amenities on which Wright would have insisted. What Happened to One of Classical Music's Most Popular Pieces? After a lengthy search, the starving castaways were thrilled to discover that the tiny island offered a plethora of .. By taking opposite paths to the solution, the public was left with an abundance of ideas for solving problems, and future generations were able to pick and choose the best ideas from both plans. I follow this with a discussion on how PAP(s) is able to withstand the challenge set by Frankfurt-style scenarios, before moving on to consider a further sufficient condition for moral responsibility. His music was heavily influenced by Liszt and Wagner, as in his Symphony in D minor, one of his most famous . Jones is therefore morally responsible for his action (even in a world corresponding to W1) in virtue of doing what he would have done in a world where alternate possibilities exist (namely, W2). Underline each predicate nominative in the following sentences. I argue that PAP does not need to be endorsed as a necessary condition for moral responsibility and, in fact, presenting PAP as a sufficient condition maintains its usefulness as a maxim for moral accountability whilst avoiding Frankfurt-style counter-examples. Which of the following arguments would a supporter of using nuclear weapons against Japan have. Example 1. Obviously, no time should be lost in inaugurating a study of this problem by experts. In the twin world condition, S is ascribed moral responsibility because alternate possibilities, should they have been available, would not have changed Ss decision making. PDF IN THE Supreme Court of the United States Why is this a problem for Frankfurt (and Watson?). , tions that representatives take on the basis of their party caucuses Young, G. The Principle of Alternate Possibilities as Sufficient but not Necessary for Moral Responsibility: A way to Avoid the Frankfurt Counter-Example. In 1906, Wendell T. Bush became associated with the Journal as co-editor. McKenna, M. (2005). Not to mention, the natural landscape certainly was not given priority in planning most suburban settlements. What is necessary is that either PAP(s) or the twin world condition is satisfied. Pereboom on the Frankfurt cases. Among all the arguments calling for an efficient international organization for peace, the existence of nuclear weapons is the most compelling one. Principle of Alternative Possibilities (PAP). Certainly, the could have done otherwise clause is indicative of one role for alternate possibilities (perhaps the most obvious): namely, making available other options at a given time. Why is the prisoner example ultimately not convincing?, Principle of . Princeton University student: Conservatives are being shut down before they can even voice an opinion. After such a demonstration the weapon might perhaps be used against Japan if the sanction of the United Nations (and if public opinion at home) were obtained, perhaps after a preliminary ultimatum to Japan to surrender or at least to evacuate certain regions as an alternative to their total destruction. It is able to do this without succumbing to Frankfurt-style counter-examples. In the original Frankfurt paper, Jones is written as Jones4, owing the fact that at previous points in his paper, Frankfurt had discussed other versions of Jones (Jones 13). The Franck Report: A Report to the Secretary of War, June 1945 The twin world condition also avoids getting bogged down in the debate over whether the relationship between the sign and the decision is indicative of determinism or is indeterminate (Ginet and Palmer 2010; Robinson 2012; Shabo 2011). ArchDaily 2008-2023. If he refuses then both will be killed. Russia and China are the only great nations at present which could survive a nuclear attack. "He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people.". In his original article, Frankfurt suggests that a twitch might be used to indicate that Jones is about to decide to do A (as opposed to no twitch for B). Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. But if you look at their . For those unfamiliar with Frankfurts original and much cited counter-example to PAP, it reads as follows: Suppose someone Black, let us say wants Jones to perform a certain action. We have to be careful, of course, about how such a description is formally presented. Yet, in the twin world condition, the role played by alternate possibilities is not one of being available to S, such that he could have done other than he did on a particular occasion (as required by PAP(s) and W2), because, of course, they are not available. Which of the following arguments would a supporter of PDF The Role of History in Thomas Franck's Fairness in International Law 21 Fairness, at 110. This item is part of a JSTOR Collection. Over the years, variations on this sign have appeared, such as flushing bright red (Blumenfeld, 1971) or similarly blushing (Widerker 1995), the monitoring of the protagonists brain for an unspecified sign (Fischer and Ravizza 1991, and Zagzebski 2000), the initiation of a specified sequence of neuronal excitation (Stump 1996) or a neurological pattern in the brain (Fischer 2002), the subjects deliberations and intentions (McKenna 2005), or even the occurrence of moral reasoning of a specified force (Pereboom 2000). Agency without avoidability: defusing a new threat to Frankfurts counterexample strategy. A. d) Which of the following arguments would a supporter of using nuclear weapons against Japan have most likely cited to explain the limitations of Franck's arguments in the first and second paragraphs? October 1999 Dipple | Mennonite Quarterly Review | Goshen College In conclusion, I aim to have shown that by positioning the principle of alternate possibilities as a sufficient condition for the ascription of moral responsibility, rather than as necessary, PAP(s) amounts to as useful a maxim as PAP for determining moral accountability. They observed that a radioactive atom releases a huge burst of energy when it is split. He may have also been fueled by heroic amounts of . posi Harry Frankfurt's description of the distinctly human quality of forming desires about their desires, opinions about their opinions. It could be suggested that the danger of destruction by nuclear weapons can be avoided -- at least as far as this country is concerned -- either by keeping our discoveries secret for an indefinite time, or else by developing our nuclear armaments at such a pace that no other nations would think of attacking us from fear of overwhelming retaliation. As a sufficient condition for moral responsibility, the principle of alternate possibilities reads as follows: A person is morally responsible for what they have done if they could have done otherwise. However, such a quantitative advantage in reserves of bottled destructive power will not make us safe from sudden attack. He then sets out, using his now famous counter-example involving Jones and Black, to show that PAP is false. And that's the way . Instead, the role played by alternative possibilities in the twin world condition is more subjunctive, insofar as what is described is a possibility rather than an actuality. Third parties help bridge the gap between state and federal legislators. Robinson, M. (2012). Just because a potential enemy will be afraid of being "outnumbered and outgunned," the temptation for him may be overwhelming to attempt a sudden unprovoked blow -- particularly if he should suspect us of harboring aggressive intentions against his security or his sphere of influence. 25 D. Held, Models of Democracy (1996), at 353, where he makes the important distinction between forms of accountability in general and democracy in particular, which is both a form of accountability and a form Widerker, D. (1995). Pereboom, D. (2000). Franck's clearest contemporary statement on these matters comes from his oft-cited letter to John Campanus. Given mutual trust and willingness on all sides to give up a certain part of their sovereign rights, by admitting international control of certain phases of national economy, the control could be exercised (alternatively or simultaneously) on two different levels. Frankfurt, H. (1969). Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. Typically, we want to ascribe moral responsibility to Jones because he decided to carry out an act that, let us say, we judge to be morally reprehensible. In the latter case, alternative possibilities are used in a more hypothetical context to assess if S would have been affected by their availability to the point of selecting one of these options should they have been available. (2010). We feel compelled to take a more active stand now because the success which we have achieved in the development of nuclear power is fraught with infinitely greater dangers than were all the inventions of the past. But in each scenario, S is also morally responsible for E in W1 in virtue of the fact that Ss action in W1 is congruent with Ss action in W2 (it is congruent with what S would have done in a world with alternate possibilities). The Journal of Philosophy, 66(23), 829839. One of these bombs could then destroy something like 3 square miles of an urban area. Philosophical Studies, 166, 553573. The answer is that all that these advantages can give us is the accumulation of a larger number of bigger and better atomic bombs. There are natural limits, 3rd or 4th order desires. By insisting on either of these conditions for the ascription of moral responsibility, we also preserve some role for alternate possibilities, thereby making it necessary that they feature in our moral decision making in some form or other. This means that, ceteris paribus, what S would have done in W2 is what S would do in W1 in the absence of intervention, otherwise the coherence of the twin world scenario falls apart. Also, we have arguably not yet made the progress toward seamless technological integration he had hoped for. Contemporaries who agreed with franck's argument in the second and This might be all the time we would have to bring about the relocation of our population and industry. 231248). Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like Dennett's Luther Argument ("character examples"). Philosophical Explorations, 8(2), 131143. Contemporaries who agreed with Franck's argument for an international agreement would likely argue that nuclear weapons pose a global threat that cannot be addressed by individual states alone. This new discovery had an immense amount of potential as a weapon of war. If indeterminism is true, then nothing prior to the choice could indicate which way he will go. The necessity of some role for alternate possibilities does not, however, in and of itself, make necessary the clause that S (or whoever) could have done otherwise. We do not need, therefore, to draw on any notion of a pre-decision flicker of freedom. FF: if he identifies, is wholeheartedly committed, it doesn't matter where it came from. Schnall, I. M. (2001). Writing that American skyscrapers have yet to earn the title of architecture, but are merely small objects such as statuettes or knick-knacks, magnified to titanic proportion, Le Corbusier proposes his plan for the skyscraper. Describes a situation in which someone is morally responsible but is unable to do otherwise. Contemporaries who agreed with Franck's argument in the second and third paragraphs regarding the need for an international agreement would most likely have made which of the following arguments to support their problem- The peace agreements should ensure that Germany could never threaten the stability of Europe again. An agreement on a higher level, involving more mutual trust and understanding, would be to allow unlimited production, but keep exact bookkeeping on the fate of each pound of uranium mined. Russia is known to be mining radium on its own territory; and even if we do not know the size of the deposits discovered so far in the USSR, the probability that no large reserves of uranium will be found in a country which covers one-fifth of the land area of the earth (and whose sphere of influence takes in additional territory) is too small to serve as a basis for security. All of us, familiar with the present state of nucleonics, live with the vision before our eyes of sudden destruction visited on our own country, of a Pearl Harbor disaster repeated in thousand-fold magnification in every one of our major cities. What does Frankfurt mean by "wholehearted commitment"? The consequences of nuclear warfare, and the type of measures which would have to be taken to protect a country from total destruction by nuclear bombing, must be as abhorrent to other nations as to the United States. The key aspect of this solution he termed autostrades, elevated motorways 16 feet (4.8 meters) above the pedestrian domain on the ground. Despite such objections, educators have continued to find Pedagogy of the Oppressed relevant and to adapt its arguments to their contemporary context. PDF The Enduring Contributions of Thomas M.Franck - New York University 7388). We felt, however, that the dilemma had to be stated, to show what kind of alternative method of protection will have to be considered if no successful international agreement is reached. As is well documented, this scenario led Frankfurt to conclude that PAP is false because, intuitively, we want to assign moral responsibility to Jones in this situation even though clauses (a) and/or (b) are not met and so he could not have done otherwise: a necessary condition for moral responsibility under the original PAP. We are fully aware of the staggering difficulties involved in such a radical change in the social and economic structure of our nation. What is Kane's "Indeterministic worlds" objection to the FF case? What if cult-man is brainwashed? On mele and Robbs indeterministic Frankfurt-style case. We therefore feel it is our duty to urge that the political problems, arising from the mastering of nuclear power, be recognized in all their gravity, and that appropriate steps be taken for their study and the preparation of necessary decisions. As for society and individual's relationship to it, Emerson believes that being an individual . The Federalist Papers (article) | Khan Academy 13. Which of the following arguments would a supporter of using nuclear In case chances for the establishment of an effective international control of nuclear weapons should have to be considered slight at the present time, then not only the use of these weapons against Japan, but even their early demonstration, may be contrary to the interests of this country. The metaphysics of free will. It is clear shallow arguments appealing to culture and sovereignty, as well as Western clumsiness and hypocrisy, have shielded human rights abuses from scrutiny. Perebooms Frankfurt case and derivative culpability. Stump, E. (1996). ProStarSolar > Blog Classic > Uncategorized > contemporaries who agreed with franck's argument. The id is entirely unconscious, while the ego operates in the conscious mind. In: J. E. Tomberlin (Ed. They did not become known as "The Federalist Papers" until the 20th century. . But the ontological argument starts, not with what we observe, but with the very idea of God and says that this idea entails that . the concept of the Congress representing the collective constituency of the whole country Frankfurt/Watson need a principled distinction here. The answer is that even though the largest now known deposits of uranium ores are under the control of powers which belong to the "western" group (Canada, Belgium and British India), the old deposits in Czechoslovakia are outside this sphere. PAP(s) and the twin world condition are therefore both sufficient to ascribe moral responsibility to Jones or S or whoever, but PAP(s) is not necessary because moral responsibility could still be attributed to the subject where PAP(s) fails to be satisfied but (and therefore because) the twin world condition is satisfied. Born in the Netherlands in 1909, Frederick Franck began his career as an oral surgeon before moving more seriously to his artist pursuits in the 1930s. Frankfurt's Compatibilism Flashcards | Quizlet PAP(s) is, however, not vulnerable to Frankfurts counter-example, as I shall now demonstrate. History doesn't matter then isnt the brainwasher really responsible? Can and Should Human Rights Be Universal? - E-International Relations Where S in W1 engages in the same action (E) as S in W2 then this is sufficient to ascribe moral responsibility to S in either world.Footnote 3In short, we have available to us the means of ascribing moral responsibility even where S could not have done otherwise. Donnelly argues both 'radical' cultural relativism and 'radical' universalism are misguided (1984, 403). A Standingathomeplate\underline{\text{Standing at home plate}}Standingathomeplate, Jesus\boxed{\text{Jess}}Jesus faced the pitcher.